Seat Toledo 2003 vs Ford Mondeo 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 235 NM | 165 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
|
Seat Toledo is more dynamic to drive. Seat Toledo engine produces 70 HP more power than Ford Mondeo, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Ford Mondeo. Thanks to more power Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 7.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.3 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Mondeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Toledo consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Toledo could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Toledo consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| 590 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Mondeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Seat Toledo 2003 1.8 engine: The engine is considered reliable, with a lifespan from 300,000 km.
The primary causes of unstable operation include air leaks through the crankcase ventilation system, throttle body malfunctions, idle air ... More about Seat Toledo 2003 1.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Seat Toledo is smaller, but slightly higher. Seat Toledo is 29 cm shorter than the Ford Mondeo, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Toledo is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 500 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.2 metres less than that of the Ford Mondeo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`865 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Seat Toledo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Mondeo has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Seat Toledo, so Seat Toledo quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Ford Mondeo has
| |