Seat Toledo 1999 vs Ford Mondeo 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 165 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
| Seat Toledo engine produces 15 HP more power than Ford Mondeo, whereas torque is 5 NM more than Ford Mondeo. Despite the higher power, Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 7.6 | |
|
The Ford Mondeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Toledo consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Toledo could require 240 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| Ford Mondeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Seat Toledo is smaller, but slightly higher. Seat Toledo is 29 cm shorter than the Ford Mondeo, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Toledo is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 500 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.2 metres less than that of the Ford Mondeo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`260 | 1`865 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Seat Toledo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Mondeo has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Seat Toledo, so Seat Toledo quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Ford Mondeo has
| |