Seat Toledo 1999 vs Volkswagen Passat 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Passat is a more dynamic driving. Seat Toledo engine produces 25 HP less power than Volkswagen Passat, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Volkswagen Passat. Due to the lower power, Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 8.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.4 l/100km | 9.0 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Toledo is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Seat Toledo consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Toledo could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Seat Toledo consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Passat gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Seat Toledo engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Audi A3, Seat Leon | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Audi A6, Skoda Octavia, Skoda Superb | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volkswagen Passat might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Seat Toledo is smaller. Seat Toledo is 26 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Passat, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Toledo is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 475 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Passat. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`232 | 1`930 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Volkswagen Passat has
| |