Seat Toledo 1999 vs Volvo S40 1996

 
Seat Toledo
1999 - 2000
Volvo S40
1996 - 1999
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.7 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 100 HP115 HP
Torque: 145 NM165 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.5 seconds11 seconds
Volvo S40 is a more dynamic driving.
Seat Toledo engine produces 15 HP less power than Volvo S40, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Volvo S40. Due to the lower power, Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.68.6
Real fuel consumption: 7.7 l/100km8.7 l/100km
The Seat Toledo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Seat Toledo consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S40, which means that by driving the Seat Toledo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Toledo consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S40.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 720 km in combined cycle690 km in combined cycle
930 km on highway890 km on highway
710 km with real consumption680 km with real consumption

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 480'000 km440'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Seat Toledo engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 11 years4 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Polo, Skoda Octavia, Seat IbizaUsed also on Volvo V40
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Seat Toledo might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.44 m4.48 m
Width: 1.74 m1.72 m
Height: 1.44 m1.41 m
Both cars are similar in size. Seat Toledo is 4 cm shorter than the Volvo S40, 2 cm wider, while the height of Seat Toledo is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no data471 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data853 litres
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volvo S40.
Gross weight (kg): 1`2001`720
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

average
Average price (€): 1400600
Pros and Cons: Seat Toledo has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • longer expected engine lifespan
Volvo S40 has
  • more power
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv