Seat Toledo 1999 vs Seat Leon 2000
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
| Seat Toledo and Seat Leon have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.7 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Toledo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Toledo consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Leon, which means that by driving the Seat Toledo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Toledo consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Leon. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Seat Toledo engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 1 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Polo, Skoda Octavia, Seat Ibiza | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Audi A3, Seat Toledo, Seat Ibiza | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Seat Toledo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Seat Toledo 1999 1.6 engine: This is a simple and reliable engine with an impressive lifespan when properly maintained. However, many of its issues stem from air leaks, so checking hoses and the intake manifold is essential. The ignition ... More about Seat Toledo 1999 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.18 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.46 m | |
| Seat Toledo is 26 cm longer than the Seat Leon, width is practically the same , while the height of Seat Toledo is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 340 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 656 litres | |
|
Seat Toledo has more luggage capacity. Seat Toledo has 160 litres more trunk space than the Seat Leon. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 1`680 kg | 1`690 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`155 kg | 1`220 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 525 kg | 470 kg | |
| Seat Toledo load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 10 procentiem more than Seat Leon. Therefore, Seat Toledo is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
| |