Seat Toledo 1999 vs Chrysler Neon 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 133 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 177 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
| Seat Toledo engine produces 33 HP less power than Chrysler Neon, whereas torque is 32 NM less than Chrysler Neon. Despite less power, Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 8.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.7 l/100km | 10.5 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Toledo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Toledo consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Neon, which means that by driving the Seat Toledo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Toledo consumes 2.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Neon. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 530 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 670 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 440 km with real consumption | ||
| Seat Toledo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 380'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Seat Toledo engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Polo, Skoda Octavia, Seat Ibiza | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler Stratus, Dodge Neon | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Seat Toledo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Seat Toledo 1999 1.6 engine: This is a simple and reliable engine with an impressive lifespan when properly maintained. However, many of its issues stem from air leaks, so checking hoses and the intake manifold is essential. The ignition ... More about Seat Toledo 1999 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.42 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Toledo is 5 cm longer than the Chrysler Neon, 3 cm wider, while the height of Seat Toledo is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 370 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.1 metres more than that of the Chrysler Neon. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Chrysler Neon has
| |