Seat Toledo 1999 vs Seat Cordoba 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 135 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
|
Seat Toledo is more dynamic to drive. Seat Toledo engine produces 25 HP more power than Seat Cordoba, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Seat Cordoba. Thanks to more power Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.7 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Cordoba is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Toledo consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Cordoba, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Toledo could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Toledo consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Cordoba. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
| Seat Toledo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 460'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Polo, Skoda Octavia, Seat Ibiza | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Polo, Skoda Octavia, Seat Ibiza | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Seat Toledo 1999 1.6 engine: This is a simple and reliable engine with an impressive lifespan when properly maintained. However, many of its issues stem from air leaks, so checking hoses and the intake manifold is essential. The ignition ... More about Seat Toledo 1999 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.16 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Seat Toledo is larger. Seat Toledo is 28 cm longer than the Seat Cordoba, 10 cm wider, while the height of Seat Toledo is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Seat Toledo has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Seat Cordoba, so Seat Toledo quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Seat Cordoba has
| |