Seat Toledo 2004 vs Ford C-Max 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Hatchback | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 102 - 160 HP | 90 - 145 HP | |
| Torque: | 148 - 320 NM | 145 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 12.9 seconds | 9.6 - 13.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 - 9.1 | 4.8 - 8.1 | |
|
Seat Toledo petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford C-Max. On average, Seat Toledo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.46 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.60 m | |
| Seat Toledo is 12 cm longer than the Ford C-Max, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Toledo is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1620 litres | |
|
Ford C-Max has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Seat Toledo has 50 litres less trunk space than the Ford C-Max. This could mean that the Seat Toledo uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.2 metres more than that of the Ford C-Max. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`375 | ~ 1`933 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Ford C-Max has
| |