Seat Toledo 1991 vs Ford Scorpio 1992
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Seat Toledo is available with front wheel drive, while Ford Scorpio can be equipped with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 | 2.0 - 2.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 - 150 HP | 92 - 194 HP | |
| Torque: | 124 - 180 NM | 171 - 275 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 - 16.5 seconds | 8.8 - 14 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 - 9.1 | 7.1 - 11.2 | |
|
Seat Toledo petrol engines consumes on average 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Scorpio. On average, Seat Toledo equipped with diesel engines consume 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Scorpio. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Seat Toledo is smaller. Seat Toledo is 35 cm shorter than the Ford Scorpio, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Toledo is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.1 metres more than that of the Ford Scorpio. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`120 | ~ 1`753 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 400 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Ford Scorpio has
| |