Seat Toledo 1991 vs Rover 400 1990
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 - 150 HP | 67 - 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 124 - 180 NM | 121 - 237 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 - 16.5 seconds | 8.4 - 12.5 seconds | |
| In general, Rover 400 are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Seat Toledo. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 - 8.9 | 5.6 - 8.9 | |
|
On average, the Seat Toledo petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Rover 400. On average, Seat Toledo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Rover 400. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.40 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Toledo is 5 cm shorter than the Rover 400, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Toledo is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1360 litres | no data | |
|
Seat Toledo has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Rover 400 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.3 metres more than that of the Rover 400. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`552 kg | ~ 1`560 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`059 kg | ~ 1`131 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 493 kg | ~ 429 kg | |
| Seat Toledo load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 13 procentiem more than Rover 400. Therefore, Seat Toledo is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 400 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Rover 400 has
| |