Seat Toledo 1995 vs Rover 400 1995
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Seat Toledo is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Rover 400 is available only with manual gearbox. | |||
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 64 - 150 HP | 75 - 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 124 - 235 NM | 117 - 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 - 17.9 seconds | 9.5 - 14 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 - 9.7 | 5.3 - 8.6 | |
|
Seat Toledo petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Rover 400. On average, Seat Toledo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Rover 400. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.39 m | |
| Seat Toledo and Rover 400 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 370 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 7320 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.2 metres more than that of the Rover 400. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`120 | ~ 1`642 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Rover 400 has
| |