Seat Toledo 1995 vs Kia Sephia 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | 1.5 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 64 - 150 HP | 80 HP | |
| Torque: | 124 - 235 NM | 120 - 125 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 - 17.9 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 - 9.7 | 7.9 - 8.4 | |
|
On average, the Seat Toledo petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Kia Sephia. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.39 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Toledo is 7 cm longer than the Kia Sephia, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Toledo is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.6 metres more than that of the Kia Sephia, which means Seat Toledo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`120 | ~ 1`350 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Kia Sephia has
| |