Seat Toledo 2013 vs Volvo V40 Cross Country 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Seat Toledo is available only with front wheel drive, while Volvo V40 Cross Country can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.6 (petrol) | 1.5 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 122 HP | 115 - 254 HP | |
| Torque: | 112 - 250 NM | 240 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 - 13.9 seconds | 6.1 - 12.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.9 - 5.9 | 3.8 - 8.3 | |
|
Seat Toledo petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo V40 Cross Country. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.47 m | |
| Seat Toledo is 11 cm longer than the Volvo V40 Cross Country, 12 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 496 litres | |
|
Seat Toledo has more luggage capacity. Seat Toledo has 54 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V40 Cross Country. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volvo V40 Cross Country. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`652 | ~ 1`996 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 200 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Volvo V40 Cross Country has
| |