Seat Toledo 1999 vs Nissan Almera 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.3 | 1.5 - 2.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 180 HP | 90 - 114 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 - 320 NM | 128 - 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 - 13.5 seconds | 11.1 - 13.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 - 9.3 | 5.7 - 7.8 | |
|
Seat Toledo petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan Almera. On average, Seat Toledo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Almera. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Seat Toledo is larger. Seat Toledo is 2 cm longer than the Nissan Almera, 4 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 393 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.5 metres more than that of the Nissan Almera, which means Seat Toledo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`349 | ~ 1`734 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Nissan Almera has
| |