Seat Leon 2000 vs Volkswagen Golf 2003
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 110 HP | 105 HP | |
Torque: | 235 NM | 250 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
Seat Leon is more dynamic to drive. Seat Leon engine produces 5 HP more power than Volkswagen Golf, but torque is 15 NM less than Volkswagen Golf. Thanks to more power Seat Leon reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 5.0 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 5.9 l/100km | 5.8 l/100km | |
By specification Seat Leon consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Leon could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Leon consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1070 km in combined cycle | 1100 km in combined cycle | |
1300 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
930 km with real consumption | 940 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.18 m | 4.20 m | |
Width: | 1.74 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.48 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Seat Leon is 2 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Golf, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Leon is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 350 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1305 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.9 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`400 | 1`850 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | above average | |
Volkswagen Golf has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Leon has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Volkswagen Golf, so Volkswagen Golf quality is probably slightly better | |||
Average price (€): | 1400 | 2800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Seat Leon has
|
Volkswagen Golf has
| |