Seat Leon 2000 vs Renault Megane 2002
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 110 HP | 120 HP | |
Torque: | 235 NM | 300 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
Renault Megane is a more dynamic driving. Seat Leon engine produces 10 HP less power than Renault Megane, whereas torque is 65 NM less than Renault Megane. Due to the lower power, Seat Leon reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 5.4 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 5.9 l/100km | 5.9 l/100km | |
The Seat Leon is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Leon consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane, which means that by driving the Seat Leon over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1070 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
1300 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
930 km with real consumption | 1010 km with real consumption | ||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 4 years | 4 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Audi A6, Seat Alhambra | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Suzuki Grand Vitara | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Seat Leon might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
The Seat Leon engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.18 m | 4.21 m | |
Width: | 1.74 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
Seat Leon is smaller. Seat Leon is 3 cm shorter than the Renault Megane, 4 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 330 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1190 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Seat Leon is 0.4 metres more than that of the Renault Megane, which means Seat Leon can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`400 | 1`820 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | low | |
Seat Leon has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Megane has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Seat Leon, so Seat Leon quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 1600 | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Seat Leon has
|
Renault Megane has
| |