Seat Leon 2000 vs Alfa Romeo 147 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 235 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
|
Seat Leon is more dynamic to drive. Seat Leon engine produces 10 HP more power than Alfa Romeo 147, whereas torque is 35 NM more than Alfa Romeo 147. Thanks to more power Seat Leon reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 5.8 | |
|
The Seat Leon is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Leon consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo 147, which means that by driving the Seat Leon over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1070 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| 1300 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.18 m | 4.17 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.44 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Leon is 1 cm longer than the Alfa Romeo 147, 1 cm wider, while the height of Seat Leon is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 280 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1030 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Leon is 0.6 metres less than that of the Alfa Romeo 147, which means Seat Leon can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`400 | 1`790 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Seat Leon has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Alfa Romeo 147 has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Seat Leon, so Seat Leon quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Leon has
|
Alfa Romeo 147 has
| |