Seat Leon 2000 vs Toyota Corolla 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 133 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.7 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Toyota Corolla is a more dynamic driving. Seat Leon engine produces 48 HP less power than Toyota Corolla, whereas torque is 147 NM less than Toyota Corolla. Due to the lower power, Seat Leon reaches 100 km/h speed 7.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 5.6 | |
|
The Seat Leon is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Leon consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla, which means that by driving the Seat Leon over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1070 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| Seat Leon gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.18 m | 4.18 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Leon and Toyota Corolla are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 310 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Leon is 0.7 metres more than that of the Toyota Corolla, which means Seat Leon can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 850 | 1`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Toyota Corolla has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Leon has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Toyota Corolla, so Toyota Corolla quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Leon has
|
Toyota Corolla has
| |