Seat Leon 2003 vs Audi A3 2000
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 225 HP | 125 HP | |
Torque: | 280 NM | 170 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
Seat Leon is more dynamic to drive. Seat Leon engine produces 100 HP more power than Audi A3, whereas torque is 110 NM more than Audi A3. Thanks to more power Seat Leon reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | 7.8 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 10.6 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
The Audi A3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Leon consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Leon could require 165 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Leon consumes 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A3. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
890 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
560 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.18 m | 4.15 m | |
Width: | 1.74 m | 1.74 m | |
Height: | 1.44 m | 1.43 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Seat Leon is 3 cm longer than the Audi A3, width is practically the same , while the height of Seat Leon is 1 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 350 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1110 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.9 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`720 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | average | |
Seat Leon has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Audi A3, so Seat Leon quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 1400 | 1400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Seat Leon has
|
Audi A3 has
| |