Seat Leon 2005 vs Audi A3 2000
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 105 HP | 102 HP | |
Torque: | 148 NM | 148 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
Seat Leon engine produces 3 HP more power than Audi A3, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 6.8 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.7 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
By specification Seat Leon consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Leon could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
710 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.18 m | 4.15 m | |
Width: | 1.74 m | 1.74 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.43 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Seat Leon is 3 cm longer than the Audi A3, width is practically the same , while the height of Seat Leon is 3 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 340 litres | 350 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1110 litres | |
Despite its longer length, Seat Leon has 10 litres less trunk space than the Audi A3. This could mean that the Seat Leon uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.9 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 1`650 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | Seat Leon has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Audi A3 has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Seat Leon, so Seat Leon quality is probably better | ||
Average price (€): | 1400 | 1400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Seat Leon has
|
| |