Seat Leon 2006 vs Volkswagen Golf 2004
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 200 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 280 NM | 200 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.2 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
Seat Leon is more dynamic to drive. Seat Leon engine produces 50 HP more power than Volkswagen Golf, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Volkswagen Golf. Thanks to more power Seat Leon reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 8.1 | |
Seat Leon consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf, which means that by driving the Seat Leon over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 360'000 km | 350'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 4 years | 5 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Audi A4, Skoda Octavia, Audi A3, Seat Altea | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Audi A3, Seat Altea, Seat Leon | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volkswagen Golf might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Seat Leon 2006 2.0 engine: This engine is often noted for its excessive oil consumption and significant carbon buildup, which primarily affect intake valves and the intake geometry adjustment mechanism. The oil consumption issue can be ... More about Seat Leon 2006 2.0 engine Volkswagen Golf 2004 2.0 engine: 2.0 FSI engine, part of the EA827 family, features a lightweight aluminum block with cast-iron liners and a unique timing system. A toothed belt drives the exhaust camshaft, while the intake camshaft is driven by a single-row chain, which also integrates with the variable valve timing mechanism. The timing regulator is ... More about Volkswagen Golf 2004 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.32 m | 4.20 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.48 m | |
Seat Leon is larger, but slightly lower. Seat Leon is 12 cm longer than the Volkswagen Golf, 1 cm wider, while the height of Seat Leon is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 341 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1305 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.9 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`400 | no data | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | average | above average | |
Volkswagen Golf has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Leon has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Volkswagen Golf, so Volkswagen Golf quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 2200 | 1800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Seat Leon has
|
Volkswagen Golf has
| |