Seat Leon 2013 vs Mazda 3 2013

 
Seat Leon
2013 - 2017
Mazda 3
2013 - 2016
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.6 Diesel1.6 Petrol
Diesel (Seat Leon) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Mazda 3) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences."

Performance

Power: 105 HP104 HP
Torque: 250 NM144 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.7 seconds13.6 seconds
Seat Leon is more dynamic to drive.
Seat Leon engine produces 1 HP more power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 106 NM more than Mazda 3. Thanks to more power Seat Leon reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 3.96.5
The Seat Leon is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Seat Leon consumes 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that by driving the Seat Leon over 15,000 km in a year you can save 390 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres51 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1280 km in combined cycle780 km in combined cycle
Seat Leon gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.23 m4.47 m
Width: 1.81 m1.80 m
Height: 1.46 m1.45 m
Seat Leon is 24 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 2 cm wider, while the height of Seat Leon is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 380 litres364 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
1150 litres1263 litres
Even though the car is shorter, The Mazda 3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 3 (by 113 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.1 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Seat Leon is 0.5 metres less than that of the Mazda 3, which means Seat Leon can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight: 1`800 kgno data
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

average
Mazda 3 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Seat Leon has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Mazda 3, so Mazda 3 quality is probably better
Average price (€): 66007000
Pros and Cons: Seat Leon has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Mazda 3 has
  • more spacious trunk with the seats down
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv