Seat Leon 2013 vs Volvo V40 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Seat Leon is more dynamic to drive. Seat Leon engine produces 40 HP less power than Volvo V40, but torque is 10 NM more than Volvo V40. Despite less power, Seat Leon reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 6.4 | |
|
The Seat Leon is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Leon consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40, which means that by driving the Seat Leon over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.24 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.44 m | |
| Seat Leon is 13 cm shorter than the Volvo V40, width is practically the same , while the height of Seat Leon is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 380 litres | 335 litres | |
|
Seat Leon has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Seat Leon has 45 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V40. The Volvo V40 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`730 | 1`920 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Volvo V40 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Leon has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Volvo V40, so Volvo V40 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8600 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Leon has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |