SAAB 9-5 2005 vs Volvo S80 2009
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 220 HP | 231 HP | |
Torque: | 310 NM | 340 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 seconds | 7.5 seconds | |
Volvo S80 is a more dynamic driving. SAAB 9-5 engine produces 11 HP less power than Volvo S80, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Volvo S80. Due to the lower power, SAAB 9-5 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.3 | 9.6 | |
The Volvo S80 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. SAAB 9-5 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S80, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the SAAB 9-5 could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.84 m | 4.85 m | |
Width: | 1.79 m | 1.89 m | |
Height: | 1.45 m | 1.49 m | |
SAAB 9-5 is smaller. SAAB 9-5 is 1 cm shorter than the Volvo S80, 10 cm narrower, while the height of SAAB 9-5 is 4 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 480 litres | |
Even though the car is shorter, SAAB 9-5 has 20 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S80. The Volvo S80 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the SAAB 9-5 is 0.9 metres less than that of the Volvo S80, which means SAAB 9-5 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 2`160 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 2600 | 6000 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 8.0/10 | 9.8/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
SAAB 9-5 has
|
Volvo S80 has
| |