SAAB 9-5 2007 vs Chevrolet Epica 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Epica is a more dynamic driving. SAAB 9-5 and Chevrolet Epica have the same engine power, but SAAB 9-5 torque is 80 NM less than Chevrolet Epica. SAAB 9-5 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.3 | 7.6 | |
|
The Chevrolet Epica is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. SAAB 9-5 consumes 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Epica, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the SAAB 9-5 could require 405 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| Chevrolet Epica gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. SAAB 9-5 is 4 cm longer than the Chevrolet Epica, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 480 litres | |
| SAAB 9-5 has 20 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Epica. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 2400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.0/10 | 8.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Chevrolet Epica has
| |