SAAB 9-5 2001 vs Jaguar S-Type 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.7 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 207 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 435 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
|
Jaguar S-Type is a more dynamic driving. SAAB 9-5 engine produces 30 HP less power than Jaguar S-Type, whereas torque is 85 NM less than Jaguar S-Type. Due to the lower power, SAAB 9-5 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 8.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km | |
|
The SAAB 9-5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification SAAB 9-5 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar S-Type, which means that by driving the SAAB 9-5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, SAAB 9-5 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar S-Type. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1020 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| 1290 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| 1000 km with real consumption | 840 km with real consumption | ||
| SAAB 9-5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (SAAB 9-5) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Jaguar S-Type) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 6 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Jaguar S-Type engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.88 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. SAAB 9-5 is 5 cm shorter than the Jaguar S-Type, 3 cm narrower, while the height of SAAB 9-5 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 370 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 810 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the SAAB 9-5 is 0.7 metres less than that of the Jaguar S-Type, which means SAAB 9-5 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 2`255 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
SAAB 9-5 has
|
Jaguar S-Type has
| |