SAAB 9-5 2002 vs SAAB 9-3 2002

 
SAAB 9-5
2002 - 2005
SAAB 9-3
2002 - 2004
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 2.2 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 120 HP125 HP
Torque: 280 NM280 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13 seconds11 seconds
SAAB 9-3 is a more dynamic driving.
SAAB 9-5 engine produces 5 HP less power than SAAB 9-3, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, SAAB 9-5 reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.46.6
Real fuel consumption: 7.3 l/100km7.0 l/100km
The SAAB 9-3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification SAAB 9-5 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the SAAB 9-5 could require 120 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, SAAB 9-5 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-3.
Fuel tank capacity: 75 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1010 km in combined cycle930 km in combined cycle
1270 km on highway1190 km on highway
1020 km with real consumption880 km with real consumption
SAAB 9-5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.83 m4.64 m
Width: 1.79 m1.76 m
Height: 1.48 m1.47 m
SAAB 9-5 is larger.
SAAB 9-5 is 19 cm longer than the SAAB 9-3, 3 cm wider, while the height of SAAB 9-5 is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no datano data
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters10.8 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`8001`600
Safety:
Quality:
above average

high
SAAB 9-3 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data SAAB 9-5 has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than SAAB 9-3, so SAAB 9-3 quality is probably slightly better
Average price (€): 12001600
Rating in user reviews: 8.4/10 7.8/10
Pros and Cons: SAAB 9-5 has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher ratings in user reviews
  • lower price
SAAB 9-3 has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv