SAAB 9-5 2002 vs Rover 75 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
|
SAAB 9-5 is more dynamic to drive. SAAB 9-5 engine produces 4 HP more power than Rover 75, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Rover 75. Thanks to more power SAAB 9-5 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 6.9 | |
|
The Rover 75 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. SAAB 9-5 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Rover 75, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the SAAB 9-5 could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
| SAAB 9-5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.39 m | |
|
SAAB 9-5 is larger. SAAB 9-5 is 8 cm longer than the Rover 75, 1 cm wider, while the height of SAAB 9-5 is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 432 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 432 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the SAAB 9-5 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Rover 75, which means SAAB 9-5 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
SAAB 9-5 has
|
Rover 75 has
| |