SAAB 9-5 1999 vs Chevrolet Epica 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 230 HP | 156 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 237 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
SAAB 9-5 is more dynamic to drive. SAAB 9-5 engine produces 74 HP more power than Chevrolet Epica, whereas torque is 113 NM more than Chevrolet Epica. Thanks to more power SAAB 9-5 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.8 | 9.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.7 l/100km | 9.7 l/100km | |
|
The Chevrolet Epica is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification SAAB 9-5 consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Epica, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the SAAB 9-5 could require 225 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, SAAB 9-5 consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Epica. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 360'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chevrolet Epica engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 14 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chevrolet Epica might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. SAAB 9-5 and Chevrolet Epica are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 480 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 1`985 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.4/10 | 8.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
SAAB 9-5 has
|
Chevrolet Epica has
| |