SAAB 9-5 2000 vs Opel Omega 1997
| Body: | Sedan | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 185 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 227 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
SAAB 9-5 is more dynamic to drive. SAAB 9-5 engine produces 15 HP more power than Opel Omega, whereas torque is 53 NM more than Opel Omega. Thanks to more power SAAB 9-5 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 11.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.9 l/100km | 11.6 l/100km | |
|
By specification SAAB 9-5 consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Omega, which means that by driving the SAAB 9-5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, SAAB 9-5 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Omega. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| 630 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (SAAB 9-5) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Opel Omega) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 320'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Opel Omega engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Opel Vectra, Opel Calibra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.50 m | |
| SAAB 9-5 is 2 cm shorter than the Opel Omega, width is practically the same , while the height of SAAB 9-5 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 540 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1800 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the SAAB 9-5 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Opel Omega. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 2`280 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| SAAB 9-5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Opel Omega has serious deffects in 275 percent more cases than SAAB 9-5, so SAAB 9-5 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
SAAB 9-5 has
|
Opel Omega has
| |