SAAB 9-5 1997 vs Volvo S70 1996

	SAAB 9-5 1997 - 2001	Volvo S70 1996 - 2000
Gearbox:	Manual	Manual
Engine:	2.0 Petrol	2.0 Petrol
Performance
Power:	150 HP	226 HP
Torque:	240 NM	310 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h:	9.8 seconds	7.7 seconds
	Volvo S70 is a more dynamic driving. SAAB 9-5 engine produces 76 HP less power than Volvo S70, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Volvo S70. Due to the lower power, SAAB 9-5 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later.
Fuel consumption
Fuel consumption (l/100km):	9.2	11.2
	The SAAB 9-5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. SAAB 9-5 consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S70, which means that by driving the SAAB 9-5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 300 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity:	75 litres	70 litres
Full fuel tank distance:	810 km in combined cycle	620 km in combined cycle
	1100 km on highway	850 km on highway
	SAAB 9-5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions
Length:	4.80 m	4.72 m
Width:	1.79 m	1.76 m
Height:	1.45 m	1.39 m
	SAAB 9-5 is larger. SAAB 9-5 is 8 cm longer than the Volvo S70, 3 cm wider, while the height of SAAB 9-5 is 6 cm higher.
Trunk capacity:	no data	470 litres
Turning diameter:	10.8 meters	no data
Gross weight (kg):	1`800	1`910

Safety:
Quality:	high	average
	SAAB 9-5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo S70 has serious deffects in 70 percent more cases than SAAB 9-5, so SAAB 9-5 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€):	1000	1200
Rating in user reviews:	9.4/10	8.0/10
Pros and Cons:	SAAB 9-5 has lower fuel consumption more full fuel tank mileage fewer faults higher ratings in user reviews lower price	Volvo S70 has more power more dynamic
Share these results to social networks or e-mail Facebook Twitter e-mail

SAAB 9-5 1997 vs Volvo S70 1996

Performance

Fuel consumption

Dimensions