SAAB 9-5 2001 vs Volvo V50 2007
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 200 HP | 230 HP | |
Torque: | 310 NM | 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 7.3 seconds | |
Volvo V50 is a more dynamic driving. SAAB 9-5 engine produces 30 HP less power than Volvo V50, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Volvo V50. Due to the lower power, SAAB 9-5 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.3 | 9.5 | |
The Volvo V50 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. SAAB 9-5 consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V50, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the SAAB 9-5 could require 270 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 62 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
860 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
Volvo V50 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.83 m | 4.52 m | |
Width: | 1.79 m | 1.77 m | |
Height: | 1.50 m | 1.46 m | |
SAAB 9-5 is larger. SAAB 9-5 is 31 cm longer than the Volvo V50, 2 cm wider, while the height of SAAB 9-5 is 4 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 417 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.1 meters | |
The turning circle of the SAAB 9-5 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volvo V50. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 2`020 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | average | |
Average price (€): | 1200 | 3200 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 8.4/10 | 6.0/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
SAAB 9-5 has
|
Volvo V50 has
| |