SAAB 9-5 2001 vs Volvo S60 2003
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 210 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | 7 seconds | |
|
Volvo S60 is a more dynamic driving. SAAB 9-5 engine produces 33 HP less power than Volvo S60, but torque is 30 NM more than Volvo S60. Due to the lower power, SAAB 9-5 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 9.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 10.3 l/100km | |
|
The SAAB 9-5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification SAAB 9-5 consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that by driving the SAAB 9-5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, SAAB 9-5 consumes 2.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 1200 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 1000 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| SAAB 9-5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volvo S60 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S80, Volvo XC90, Volvo XC70 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volvo S60 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.43 m | |
| SAAB 9-5 is 25 cm longer than the Volvo S60, 1 cm narrower, while the height of SAAB 9-5 is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 424 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1034 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the SAAB 9-5 is 1.2 metres less than that of the Volvo S60, which means SAAB 9-5 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 2`010 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.4/10 | 8.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
SAAB 9-5 has
|
Volvo S60 has
| |