SAAB 9-5 2001 vs BMW 5 series 2004
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 177 HP | 177 HP | |
Torque: | 350 NM | 400 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
BMW 5 series is a more dynamic driving. SAAB 9-5 and BMW 5 series have the same engine power, but SAAB 9-5 torque is 50 NM less than BMW 5 series. SAAB 9-5 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 8.0 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km | |
The SAAB 9-5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification SAAB 9-5 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series, which means that by driving the SAAB 9-5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, SAAB 9-5 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
1200 km on highway | 1070 km on highway | ||
1000 km with real consumption | 840 km with real consumption | ||
SAAB 9-5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Front-wheel drive cars (SAAB 9-5) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW 5 series) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 480'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a BMW 5 series engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 4 years | 12 years | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW 5 series might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
The BMW 5 series engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
BMW 5 sērija 2004 2.5 engine: Overall, the M57 diesel engine is known for its high reliability and can deliver an exceptionally long service life when properly maintained with high-quality fuel and oil. Fuel quality is especially critical ... More about BMW 5 sērija 2004 2.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.83 m | 4.84 m | |
Width: | 1.79 m | 1.85 m | |
Height: | 1.50 m | 1.49 m | |
SAAB 9-5 is smaller, but slightly higher. SAAB 9-5 is 1 cm shorter than the BMW 5 series, 6 cm narrower, while the height of SAAB 9-5 is 1 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 500 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1650 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the SAAB 9-5 is 0.2 metres less than that of the BMW 5 series. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 2`285 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | above average | average | |
Average price (€): | 1200 | 4000 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 8.4/10 | 8.3/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
SAAB 9-5 has
|
BMW 5 sērija has
| |