SAAB 9-5 2003 vs Volvo V50 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 220 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
SAAB 9-5 is more dynamic to drive. SAAB 9-5 engine produces 80 HP more power than Volvo V50, whereas torque is 90 NM more than Volvo V50. Thanks to more power SAAB 9-5 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.3 | 9.1 | |
|
The Volvo V50 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. SAAB 9-5 consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V50, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the SAAB 9-5 could require 180 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.46 m | |
|
SAAB 9-5 is larger. SAAB 9-5 is 31 cm longer than the Volvo V50, 2 cm wider, while the height of SAAB 9-5 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 417 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the SAAB 9-5 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volvo V50. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 1`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 3200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.4/10 | 6.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
SAAB 9-5 has
|
Volvo V50 has
| |