SAAB 9-5 2002 vs Volvo S60 2002

 
SAAB 9-5
2002 - 2005
Volvo S60
2002 - 2004
Body: Estate car / wagonSedan
The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.2 Diesel2.4 Diesel

Performance

Power: 120 HP130 HP
Torque: 280 NM280 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.9 seconds12 seconds
SAAB 9-5 engine produces 10 HP less power than Volvo S60, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite less power, SAAB 9-5 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.96.5
The Volvo S60 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
SAAB 9-5 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the SAAB 9-5 could require 60 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 75 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1080 km in combined cycle1070 km in combined cycle
1380 km on highway1370 km on highway

Dimensions

Length: 4.83 m4.58 m
Width: 1.79 m1.80 m
Height: 1.50 m1.43 m
SAAB 9-5 is 25 cm longer than the Volvo S60, 1 cm narrower, while the height of SAAB 9-5 is 7 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no data424 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1034 litres
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the SAAB 9-5 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volvo S60.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8002`030
Safety:
Quality:
above average

above average
Average price (€): 12001400
Rating in user reviews: 8.4/10 8.0/10
Pros and Cons: SAAB 9-5 has
  • higher safety
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Volvo S60 has
  • more power
  • lower fuel consumption
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv