SAAB 9-5 2001 vs Volvo S60 2003

 
SAAB 9-5
2001 - 2005
Volvo S60
2003 - 2004
Body: Estate car / wagonSedan
The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 150 HP180 HP
Torque: 240 NM240 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.5 seconds9.5 seconds
Volvo S60 is a more dynamic driving.
SAAB 9-5 engine produces 30 HP less power than Volvo S60, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, SAAB 9-5 reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.610.0
The Volvo S60 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
SAAB 9-5 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the SAAB 9-5 could require 90 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 660 km in combined cycle700 km in combined cycle
880 km on highway920 km on highway
Volvo S60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.83 m4.58 m
Width: 1.79 m1.80 m
Height: 1.50 m1.43 m
SAAB 9-5 is 25 cm longer than the Volvo S60, 1 cm narrower, while the height of SAAB 9-5 is 7 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no data424 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1034 litres
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the SAAB 9-5 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volvo S60.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8002`030
Safety:
Quality:
above average

above average
Average price (€): 12001600
Rating in user reviews: 8.4/10 8.0/10
Pros and Cons: SAAB 9-5 has
  • higher safety
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Volvo S60 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv