SAAB 9-5 2005 vs Chevrolet Epica 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.9 - 2.3 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 260 HP | 141 - 156 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 - 350 NM | 195 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 - 11.6 seconds | 9.7 - 10.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 - 10.3 | 6.1 - 9.3 | |
|
SAAB 9-5 petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Epica. On average, SAAB 9-5 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Epica. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. SAAB 9-5 is 4 cm longer than the Chevrolet Epica, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 480 litres | |
| SAAB 9-5 has 20 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Epica. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`800 | ~ 1`985 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 2400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.0/10 | 8.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Chevrolet Epica has
| |