SAAB 9-5 2001 vs Volvo XC70 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
SAAB 9-5 is available with front wheel drive, while Volvo XC70 can be equipped with four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 | 2.4 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 120 - 250 HP | 163 - 210 HP | |
Torque: | 240 - 350 NM | 320 - 400 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 - 13.5 seconds | 8.1 - 11.5 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 - 11.3 | 7.6 - 11.1 | |
SAAB 9-5 petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo XC70. On average, SAAB 9-5 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC70. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.83 m | 4.73 m | |
Width: | 1.79 m | 1.86 m | |
Height: | 1.50 m | 1.56 m | |
SAAB 9-5 is 10 cm longer than the Volvo XC70, 7 cm narrower, while the height of SAAB 9-5 is 6 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 485 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1641 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the SAAB 9-5 is 0.8 metres less than that of the Volvo XC70, which means SAAB 9-5 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`800 | ~ 2`220 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | below average | |
Average price (€): | 1200 | 3800 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 8.4/10 | 8.0/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
SAAB 9-5 has
|
Volvo XC70 has
| |