SAAB 9-5 2001 vs Volvo XC70 2004

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
SAAB 9-5
2001 - 2005
Volvo XC70
2004 - 2007
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
SAAB 9-5 is available with front wheel drive, while Volvo XC70 can be equipped with four wheel (4x4) drive.
Engines: 2.0 - 3.02.4 - 2.5

Performance

Power: 120 - 250 HP163 - 210 HP
Torque: 240 - 350 NM320 - 400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.3 - 13.5 seconds8.1 - 11.5 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.9 - 11.37.6 - 11.1
SAAB 9-5 petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo XC70. On average, SAAB 9-5 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC70.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.83 m4.73 m
Width: 1.79 m1.86 m
Height: 1.50 m1.56 m
SAAB 9-5 is 10 cm longer than the Volvo XC70, 7 cm narrower, while the height of SAAB 9-5 is 6 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data485 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1641 litres
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters11.6 meters
The turning circle of the SAAB 9-5 is 0.8 metres less than that of the Volvo XC70, which means SAAB 9-5 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`800~ 2`220
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

below average
Average price (€): 12003800
Rating in user reviews: 8.4/10 8.0/10
Pros and Cons: SAAB 9-5 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Volvo XC70 has
  • available with 4x4 drive
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv