SAAB 9-5 2001 vs Skoda Octavia 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| SAAB 9-5 is available only with front wheel drive, while Skoda Octavia can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 - 250 HP | 102 - 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 - 350 NM | 148 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 - 13.5 seconds | 7.5 - 14 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 - 11.3 | 5.1 - 8.3 | |
|
SAAB 9-5 petrol engines consumes on average 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Skoda Octavia. On average, SAAB 9-5 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Octavia. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.47 m | |
|
SAAB 9-5 is larger. SAAB 9-5 is 26 cm longer than the Skoda Octavia, 2 cm wider, while the height of SAAB 9-5 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 580 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1630 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the SAAB 9-5 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Skoda Octavia, which means SAAB 9-5 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`800 | ~ 1`998 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.4/10 | 7.9/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
SAAB 9-5 has
|
Skoda Octavia has
| |