SAAB 9-3 2010 vs Mazda 6 2008
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 330 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Mazda 6 is a more dynamic driving. SAAB 9-3 engine produces 10 HP more power than Mazda 6, but torque is 10 NM less than Mazda 6. Despite the higher power, SAAB 9-3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 5.6 | |
|
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. SAAB 9-3 consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the SAAB 9-3 could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.65 m | 4.76 m | |
| Width: | 2.04 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.44 m | |
| SAAB 9-3 is 11 cm shorter than the Mazda 6, 24 cm wider, while the height of SAAB 9-3 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 351 litres | 510 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1702 litres | |
|
Mazda 6 has more luggage space. SAAB 9-3 has 159 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 6. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`060 | 2`075 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
SAAB 9-3 has
|
Mazda 6 has
| |