SAAB 9-3 2010 vs Volvo S60 2002

	SAAB 9-3 2010 - 2011	Volvo S60 2002 - 2004
Gearbox:	Manual	Manual
Engine:	2.8 Petrol	2.5 Petrol
Performance
Power:	280 HP	210 HP
Torque:	400 NM	320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h:	6.1 seconds	7.3 seconds
	SAAB 9-3 is more dynamic to drive. SAAB 9-3 engine produces 70 HP more power than Volvo S60, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Volvo S60. Thanks to more power SAAB 9-3 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster.
Fuel consumption
Fuel consumption (l/100km):	10.0	9.8
	SAAB 9-3 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the SAAB 9-3 could require 30 litres more fuel.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type
Wheel drive type:	All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)	4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)
Dimensions
Length:	4.65 m	4.58 m
Width:	2.04 m	1.80 m
Height:	1.47 m	1.43 m
	SAAB 9-3 is larger. SAAB 9-3 is 7 cm longer than the Volvo S60, 24 cm wider, while the height of SAAB 9-3 is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity:	351 litres	424 litres
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible	no data	1034 litres
	Volvo S60 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the SAAB 9-3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter:	no data	12 meters
Gross weight:	2`100 kg	2`060 kg

Safety:	no data
Quality:	no data	above average
Average price (€):	4000	1400
Pros and Cons:	SAAB 9-3 has more power more dynamic	Volvo S60 has roomier boot lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail Facebook Twitter e-mail

SAAB 9-3 2010 vs Volvo S60 2002

Performance

Fuel consumption

Drive type

Dimensions