SAAB 9-3 2010 vs Volvo S60 2003

 
SAAB 9-3
2010 - 2011
Volvo S60
2003 - 2004
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 210 HP180 HP
Torque: 300 NM240 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.7 seconds8.8 seconds
SAAB 9-3 is more dynamic to drive.
SAAB 9-3 engine produces 30 HP more power than Volvo S60, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Volvo S60. Thanks to more power SAAB 9-3 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.89.2
Real fuel consumption: 9.1 l/100km11.0 l/100km
The SAAB 9-3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification SAAB 9-3 consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that by driving the SAAB 9-3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, SAAB 9-3 consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60.

Dimensions

Length: 4.65 m4.58 m
Width: 2.04 m1.80 m
Height: 1.47 m1.43 m
SAAB 9-3 is larger.
SAAB 9-3 is 7 cm longer than the Volvo S60, 24 cm wider, while the height of SAAB 9-3 is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 351 litres424 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1034 litres
Volvo S60 has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, SAAB 9-3 has 73 litres less trunk space than the Volvo S60. This could mean that the SAAB 9-3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: no data11 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`9802`010
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 44001400
Pros and Cons: SAAB 9-3 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
Volvo S60 has
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv