SAAB 9-3 2010 vs Chevrolet Cruze 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 141 HP | |
| Torque: | 167 NM | 176 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Cruze is a more dynamic driving. SAAB 9-3 engine produces 19 HP less power than Chevrolet Cruze, whereas torque is 9 NM less than Chevrolet Cruze. Due to the lower power, SAAB 9-3 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 6.8 | |
|
The Chevrolet Cruze is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. SAAB 9-3 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Cruze, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the SAAB 9-3 could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.65 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 2.04 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.68 m | |
|
SAAB 9-3 is larger, but lower. SAAB 9-3 is 5 cm longer than the Chevrolet Cruze, 25 cm wider, while the height of SAAB 9-3 is 20 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 351 litres | 450 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Cruze has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, SAAB 9-3 has 99 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Cruze. This could mean that the SAAB 9-3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`910 | 1`793 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Chevrolet Cruze has
| |