SAAB 9-3 1999 vs SAAB 9-3 2002
| Body: | Coupe | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 205 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
SAAB 9-3 1999 is more dynamic to drive. SAAB 9-3 1999 engine produces 55 HP more power than SAAB 9-3 2002, whereas torque is 40 NM more than SAAB 9-3 2002. Thanks to more power SAAB 9-3 1999 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 | 8.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.0 l/100km | 8.9 l/100km | |
|
The SAAB 9-3 2002 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification SAAB 9-3 1999 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-3 2002, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the SAAB 9-3 1999 could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, SAAB 9-3 1999 consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-3 2002. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.47 m | |
|
SAAB 9-3 1999 is smaller. SAAB 9-3 1999 is 1 cm shorter than the SAAB 9-3 2002, 5 cm narrower, while the height of SAAB 9-3 1999 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the SAAB 9-3 1999 is 0.3 metres less than that of the SAAB 9-3 2002. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.8/10 | 7.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
SAAB 9-3 has
|
SAAB 9-3 has
| |