SAAB 9-3 1999 vs Chrysler Neon 1997
| Body: | Coupe | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 205 HP | 133 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 174 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 seconds | 8.8 seconds | |
|
SAAB 9-3 is more dynamic to drive. SAAB 9-3 engine produces 72 HP more power than Chrysler Neon, whereas torque is 106 NM more than Chrysler Neon. Thanks to more power SAAB 9-3 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 | 8.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.0 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
|
The Chrysler Neon is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification SAAB 9-3 consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Neon, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the SAAB 9-3 could require 150 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, SAAB 9-3 consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Neon. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
| SAAB 9-3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.37 m | |
| SAAB 9-3 is 27 cm longer than the Chrysler Neon, width is practically the same , while the height of SAAB 9-3 is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 364 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the SAAB 9-3 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Chrysler Neon. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
SAAB 9-3 has
|
Chrysler Neon has
| |