SAAB 9-3 1999 vs Toyota Celica 1994
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 205 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 154 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
SAAB 9-3 is more dynamic to drive. SAAB 9-3 engine produces 89 HP more power than Toyota Celica, whereas torque is 126 NM more than Toyota Celica. Thanks to more power SAAB 9-3 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 | 7.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.0 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Celica is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification SAAB 9-3 consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Celica, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the SAAB 9-3 could require 165 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, SAAB 9-3 consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Celica. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.30 m | |
| SAAB 9-3 is 21 cm longer than the Toyota Celica, 4 cm narrower, while the height of SAAB 9-3 is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 283 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the SAAB 9-3 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Toyota Celica. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`510 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
SAAB 9-3 has
|
Toyota Celica has
| |