SAAB 9-3 1999 vs Toyota Celica 2002
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 205 HP | 192 HP | |
Torque: | 280 NM | 180 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 seconds | 7.4 seconds | |
SAAB 9-3 is more dynamic to drive. SAAB 9-3 engine produces 13 HP more power than Toyota Celica, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Toyota Celica. Thanks to more power SAAB 9-3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 | 8.4 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 10.0 l/100km | 8.6 l/100km | |
The Toyota Celica is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification SAAB 9-3 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Celica, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the SAAB 9-3 could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, SAAB 9-3 consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Celica. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
960 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
640 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
SAAB 9-3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.63 m | 4.35 m | |
Width: | 1.71 m | 1.74 m | |
Height: | 1.43 m | 1.32 m | |
SAAB 9-3 is 28 cm longer than the Toyota Celica, 3 cm narrower, while the height of SAAB 9-3 is 11 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the SAAB 9-3 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Toyota Celica. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`200 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | above average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 2800 | 2800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
SAAB 9-3 has
|
Toyota Celica has
| |