SAAB 9-3 1999 vs Toyota Celica 2002

 
SAAB 9-3
1999 - 2002
Toyota Celica
2002 - 2005
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol1.8 Petrol

Performance

Power: 205 HP192 HP
Torque: 280 NM180 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.3 seconds7.4 seconds
SAAB 9-3 is more dynamic to drive.
SAAB 9-3 engine produces 13 HP more power than Toyota Celica, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Toyota Celica. Thanks to more power SAAB 9-3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.08.4
Real fuel consumption: 10.0 l/100km8.6 l/100km
The Toyota Celica is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification SAAB 9-3 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Celica, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the SAAB 9-3 could require 90 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, SAAB 9-3 consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Celica.
Fuel tank capacity: 64 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 710 km in combined cycle650 km in combined cycle
960 km on highway830 km on highway
640 km with real consumption630 km with real consumption
SAAB 9-3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.63 m4.35 m
Width: 1.71 m1.74 m
Height: 1.43 m1.32 m
SAAB 9-3 is 28 cm longer than the Toyota Celica, 3 cm narrower, while the height of SAAB 9-3 is 11 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no datano data
Turning diameter: 10.5 meters10.4 meters
The turning circle of the SAAB 9-3 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Toyota Celica.
Gross weight (kg): 1`6001`200
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average
no data
Average price (€): 28002800
Pros and Cons: SAAB 9-3 has
  • more power
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Toyota Celica has
  • lower fuel consumption
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv