SAAB 9-3 2000 vs SAAB 9-3 2002
Body: | Coupe | Sedan | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 185 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 263 NM | 240 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
SAAB 9-3 2000 is more dynamic to drive. SAAB 9-3 2000 engine produces 35 HP more power than SAAB 9-3 2002, whereas torque is 23 NM more than SAAB 9-3 2002. Thanks to more power SAAB 9-3 2000 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 9.4 | |
The SAAB 9-3 2002 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. SAAB 9-3 2000 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-3 2002, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the SAAB 9-3 2000 could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 62 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
860 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.63 m | 4.64 m | |
Width: | 1.71 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.43 m | 1.47 m | |
SAAB 9-3 2000 is smaller. SAAB 9-3 2000 is 1 cm shorter than the SAAB 9-3 2002, 5 cm narrower, while the height of SAAB 9-3 2000 is 4 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the SAAB 9-3 2000 is 0.3 metres less than that of the SAAB 9-3 2002. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`600 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | high | high | |
Average price (€): | 2400 | 1600 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.8/10 | 7.8/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
SAAB 9-3 has
|
SAAB 9-3 has
| |