SAAB 9-3 1998 vs Toyota Celica 1999
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 185 HP | 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 172 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
|
SAAB 9-3 is more dynamic to drive. SAAB 9-3 engine produces 42 HP more power than Toyota Celica, whereas torque is 58 NM more than Toyota Celica. Thanks to more power SAAB 9-3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.8 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.7 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Celica is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification SAAB 9-3 consumes 3.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Celica, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the SAAB 9-3 could require 465 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, SAAB 9-3 consumes 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Celica. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| 630 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Celica gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Toyota Celica 1999 1.8 engine: The 1ZZ-FE engine is more advanced, lighter, and simpler than its predecessor, emphasizing fuel efficiency and output. However, these improvements have come at the cost of reduced durability compared to earlier cast-iron engines. The engine block features an open-deck cooling design for easier production and lower ... More about Toyota Celica 1999 1.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.32 m | |
| SAAB 9-3 is 29 cm longer than the Toyota Celica, 3 cm narrower, while the height of SAAB 9-3 is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the SAAB 9-3 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Toyota Celica. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
SAAB 9-3 has
|
Toyota Celica has
| |